Will the Lakers Be Goofd Again

Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

The Los Angeles Lakers are the best franchise in American sports over the concluding 65 years, just their past model of success doesn't guarantee time to come success. In fact, it's unsustainable in today'due south NBA.

There'southward no statement virtually whether the Lakers and their fans accept reason to be proud of their accomplishments. Over the span of near 2-thirds of a century, they've competed for nearly one-half of all NBA titles, having been to the Finals 31 times in 64 years. Not even the Yankees, with 25 pennants since 1949, can come up close to that.

They've missed the playoffs just five times—e'er.  And they've but missed the postseason twice since America celebrated the Bicentennial. They've won 3,170 games, more than any squad in NBA history, and more than the Boston Celtics, who have 62 fewer wins in 91 more contests.

The Lakers accept a franchise winning percentage of .619, the best in the Clan and the best in whatever of the four major American professional sports leagues.

They have 440 playoff wins, per Basketball-Reference, 96 more than any other team.

The Celtics may have 1 more title, but when information technology comes to being in the title picture, they haven't been as consistent. Year-in, year-out, the Lakers have been the virtually successful team in the NBA, and all of American sports. The show is merely besides compelling to deny that.

Is information technology any wonder that Lakers fans take grown to non but hope, but even wait their team to debate for the title every year?

So, even with Dwight Howard's difference, there'south little wonder that Lakers Nation just points to the cap infinite they'll have in 2014 and assumes that it's a matter of signing complimentary agents and reloading. According to Sham Sports, the simply contracts they have next season belongs to Steve Nash for $9.seven million (and that's if he doesn't retire) and Nick Young, who has a player option for $1.3 million.

The Lakers have ever done it. So why can't they just exercise it again? Well, permit'due south recollect about that.

For 1,200 years, Rome stood equally the height of civilization, merely when information technology started to fall, the hubris of its citizenry led them to believe that it would always stand because it had ever stood.  Some argue that was the greatest factor in its eventual fall. Rome failed to recognize the way the world had inverse, that other empires had grown, technology had adult and military strategies which had previously been successful were no longer useful.

Similarly, the Lakers are settling into that same stew, assuring themselves that by portends futurity, not recognizing the style the league has changed or how the Collective Bargaining Agreement has inverse the mode that championship teams and contenders are built.

The Lakers' model has always been simple: Get the all-time center in the league, and build around him past players you lot draft.

In their inception, they got George Mikan, who was the key slice in their first five banners. The showtime v wins in Minneapolis are unique in that he was the lonely nifty center on the team.

Their adjacent championship win came over a decade later in 1972, iii years after they traded for Wilt Chamberlain. They'd tried and failed repeatedly to go by the Boston Celtics through their years of domination. But when they added Chamberlain to Jerry West and Elgin Baylor, it eventually paid dividends and they won the title (though Baylor wasn't a major cistron by and then).

Iv years subsequently they traded to go Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and started to build around him.

In 1979 Jerry Osculation bought the team for $67 meg, and the following season the Lakers would win their first title with Abdul-Jabbar, aided by rookie phenom Earvin "Magic" Johnson. They would proceed to win four more titles with that tandem.

In the 1996 offseason they acquired Shaquille O'Neal via complimentary agency, who became the cornerstone of their next iii titles, along with the up-and-coming superstar, Kobe Bryant, whom they obtained in a typhoon-solar day trade.

After non competing for a title during three consecutive years, Kobe Bryant starting boot upward dust, suggesting he wanted to be traded unless the Lakers made a move to get him "aid." The Lakers acquiesced and got him Pau Gasol, arguably the best center in the league at the time.

Gasol helped Bryant to win two more titles.

And there you take it. In their 12 titles since moving to Los Angeles, there have been three consistencies: They've always had the all-time eye in the game when they won; they've always taken him from somewhere else; and they've ever combined him with an elite baby-sit whom they drafted and clean-cut.

They tried to repeat that formula in getting Howard, but Howard fled and that is all the difference. Now they don't have the typhoon picks or the trade chips to follow through on that formula.

This is important to realize because the whole notion of the Lakers "having ever done it, so they're going to detect a fashion to do it" has to take into business relationship how they've washed it. Who do they have to offer as trade fries? What do they accept for draft picks to land the next great Laker?

Now, the Lakers will be bad this year, but they won't be bad as the others who are wiggin' for (Andrew) Wiggins. They'll get ping pong balls, but they won't get enough to have a realistic chance at getting him.

The reality is they aren't going to bottom out this yr. They'll still accept a capable Pau Gasol, who isn't worth his $20 million check, but he's better than most, and they however have Steve Nash. If Kobe Bryant comes back, they'll still take him, likewise.

They may but win thirty to xl games (depending on if and when Bryant returns and how well he plays), enough to authorize for around the 17-20th "best" team in the league, right in that sweet spot of missing the playoffs and non getting a good enough pick to make yous feel improve nigh it.

Their 2015 pick, unless they're a lesser-five team (which they probably won't be) goes to the Phoenix Suns. Past then, even any youthful drink Bryant is gulping will have lost its dominance.

They get to keep their 2016 pick, and that might be a elevation-iii option. But that would as well mean they're a bottom-3 team.

And and so in 2017, Orlando probably gets their pick.

So the chances of the Lakers scoring a not bad player in the draft aren't very realistic. They take ii get-go-round picks in five years, counting this twelvemonth, and merely 1 of them is probable to exist a height-x selection.

And trades don't look better. They have almost no avails worth talking about. They couldn't trade Bryant'southward massive contract, even if they wanted to. If they could, information technology would be for horrible, long-term contracts. Teams aren't itching to send $30 million worth of young and talented future for a Hall of Famer in his mid-30 with a blown Achilles.

And they wouldn't want to anyway.

Pau Gasol isn't going anywhere. Again, who is going to send $xx 1000000 worth of role player to the Lakers for an aging center with i year on his contract? The only incentive to trade for him is to get the expiring contract, so the render would hateful that the Lakers would take to take on bad contracts, which would swallow upwards their cap space next summer.

Who else are they going to move? Steve Nash is also old. Hashemite kingdom of jordan Hill has hope, but not enough to really offer anything for. They don't take whatsoever trade chips. And as previously discussed, they've tapped out on their first-round picks so they can't trade them, either. Teams aren't ready to fire off their premier players for the Lakers 2019 first-circular pick.

The lesser line is that in the big picture of the trade market, the Lakers are flat broke. They can't trade for anyone and they don't have plenty draft picks to build a team effectually.

Just what about all that greenbacks they have to spend in free agency in 2014? That'south got to be worth something correct?

For all the talk about Dwight Howard's movement to the Houston Rockets and the freed-up cap infinite the Lakers will have in 2014, the nearly salient point of all gets lost: Howard'south move signifies that the Lakers model has gone the way of Rome in 410 afterward Alaric I sacked the metropolis. Information technology's non just an event; it's a demarcation of the beginning of the empire's stop.

Howard'southward movement proves ane matter nearly the new style of the NBA and the impact of the new CBA: It's non about who you lot play for, it's about who you play with. It's not the name on the front of your bailiwick of jersey, or fifty-fifty on the dorsum of information technology. It'south the name you can read on the back of your teammate's jersey.

And, as future Hall of Famers Bryant and Dirk Nowitzki discovered, if that name belongs to a player in his mid-30s, elite players in their prime number aren't fix to ring together with past greats when they can ally with the future of the league.

Only they're the Lakers! Everyone would love to come and play for the Lakers!

The allure of playing for the legacy of the Purple and Gilt doesn't agree the charm that some in Lakers Nation would similar to believe. For every player who grew up dreaming of helping the Lakers win the title, in that location are at least two who grew up with hopes of defeating them for a title.

Nor is in that location really a corking history of free agents coming to LA.

In fact, other than Shaquille O'Neal, what franchise free agent has ever come up to the Lakers? Their reputation for landing whomever they want, whenever they want is inflated to the betoken of hyperbole. Afterwards O'Neal, who is their biggest complimentary-agent acquisition? Metta World Peace?

Now y'all might argue that'southward only because they didn't have cap space, simply again, let's not look past what just happened this summertime. They got left at the dance.

This notion that NBA superstars in the prime number of their careers are going to abandon their teams, leave millions of dollars on the table and rush to the City of Angels for the chance to play with Kobe Bryant is not but completely unrealistic, it'southward the verbal opposite of what Howard only did.

Howard left millions of dollars on the table to get out of LA, in part, according to World Peace, as reported by Marking Median of the Los Angeles Daily News, so he wouldn't have to play with Bryant.  That's pretty telling.

Is it possible that other players would cull a different path? Sure, merely why would they? What benefit does LeBron James or Carmelo Anthony have to leave where they're at and come to Los Angeles?

Money? Neither player is in demand of that. In fact, James received $40 million in endorsements last year, even more than Bryant's $32 1000000, according to Kurt Badenhausen of Forbes. He was the NBA's second-highest earner in 2013. Anthony was sixth. Neither player is going to get paid more if they switch teams.

Championships? Going to LA is no guarantee of winning ane, or even having a chance at winning one. Sorry, the entreatment of deferring to a 35-yr-old Kobe Bryant (as he'll be past then) probably doesn't have as much appeal as some might retrieve.

Nor does taking all the blame from media and fans if the team loses while getting none of the glory if they win hold any appeal. If the Lakers were to win another title, information technology would be "Kobe's 6th" not "LeBron'southward tertiary" (or 4th) or "Melo'southward first" (or 2d).

If either player were to carelessness their present squad to win, they would do so to go to a team that has the pieces in place already. Why would they take the Lakers and promises of what might happen over a gamble to play with Kyrie Irving and visitor in Cleveland, or Derrick Rose and company in Chicago?

The Lakers' legacy is slap-up, but you can't win the banners that have already been won. Players in the present aren't playing to uphold the glory of the past; they are playing to carve out a legacy for the future.

None of the banners hanging from the rafters in the Staples Eye help the Lakers now. None of the players from those great teams can step downward and play at present.

What about the likes of Paul George, Kyrie Irving and the other restricted-free-agent names who have been bandied about? Well, they're restricted. That means that whatever the Lakers make up one's mind to do, they aren't going to land George, Irving or whatsoever other franchise-level RFA.

They volition all have their extensions earlier they ever striking the market, and if past some miracle they practice hit the market, the respective squad will match any offers.

Then that leaves the Lakers with very few practiced options in 2014. The pitiful reality of that market is that information technology'due south getting diddled out of proportion. A large office of it rests on the notion of players leaving their teams, which may or may not happen.

Accept an honest expect at the 2014 complimentary-agent course. James and Anthony could only as easily stay. That they would get out at all is largely only speculation. Look at the list of players who don't have options, and where at that place are no team or player options.

Look at merely the guaranteed unrestricted free agents. The best two players who are still in their prime number on that listing are Luol Deng and Danny Granger. That's the most the Lakers might reasonably hope to acquire. Having money to spend doesn't guarantee you lot get nifty players. Just enquire the Detroit Pistons.

It's not a future the Lakers fans desire to confront, merely while they view the smoldering remains of their declining franchise equally the proverbial Visigoths sack the city, it'south going to first to sink in. This isn't going to be another year where the Lakers stride dorsum and rebuild. This is the end of the empire.

The greatness of the Lakers legacy is without question, just the relevance on that greatness to their futurity is not. Without a playoff roster at present, or any meaningful way of acquiring one for at least three or four years,  the Lakers are almost to set on their darkest path in franchise history.

papederming.blogspot.com

Source: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1724519-why-la-lakers-model-for-success-is-unsustainable-in-todays-nba

Share this post